← Back to Blog

Debunking: You Must Avoid Meme Stocks for Credit Put Spreads

Debunking: You Must Avoid Meme Stocks for Credit Put Spreads

Debunking: You Must Avoid Meme Stocks for Credit Put Spreads

In the world of options trading, few topics generate as much instant dismissal as meme stocks. The phrase conjures images of extreme volatility, irrational price action, and community-driven pumps and dumps. For traders employing defined-risk strategies like credit put spreads, the conventional wisdom is clear: stay away. But is this blanket avoidance a prudent rule, or is it a myth that prevents traders from accessing unique opportunities? Today, we’re busting the myth that you must categorically avoid meme stocks for credit put spreads.

Understanding the Core of the Myth

The reasoning behind the "avoid at all costs" advice is not without merit. Meme stocks—companies like GameStop (GME), AMC Entertainment (AMC), or others that experience explosive retail-driven interest—exhibit characteristics that are anathema to traditional premium-selling strategies:

  • Extreme Implied Volatility (IV): Options premiums are inflated due to anticipated wild price swings. While this means more premium collected, it also signifies the market's expectation of massive risk.
  • Unpredictable Catalysts: Price movement can be driven by social media sentiment, online forum chatter, or short-squeeze dynamics rather than fundamental business performance.
  • High Risk of Gap Moves: These stocks can open significantly up or down relative to the previous close, bypassing the stop-losses of traditional stock traders and potentially blowing through your spread's short and long strikes instantly.

For a strategy designed to profit from time decay and stable-to-bullish price action, these traits seem like a recipe for disaster. However, total avoidance is a simplistic view. The truth lies not in what you trade, but in how you approach it.

The Truth: It’s About Adjusted Framework, Not Total Avoidance

The key to responsibly using credit put spreads on volatile underlyings is to fundamentally adjust your trading framework. You cannot apply the same rules you use for a stable blue-chip like Apple or Coca-Cola. Let's break down the adjusted principles.

1. Redefine "Safe" Strikes and Probability of Profit

With a typical stock, you might sell a put spread 20-30% out-of-the-money (OTM) for a high Probability of Profit (POP). With a meme stock, a 30% OTM move can happen in a single afternoon. Therefore, you must go much further OTM.

Practical Example: Imagine stock XYZ is trading at $100 with extremely high IV. A traditional 30% OTM short put would be at the $70 strike. For a meme stock, this is likely still far too risky. Instead, you might look 50-60% OTM, at the $40 or $50 strike. Your goal isn't to capture the juiciest premium at the $70 strike, but to find a premium that is still attractive relative to the capital risked at a much safer distance.

Your POP should be significantly higher—aiming for 85%+ visualized on your platform, understanding that these estimates are less reliable with skewed volatility.

2. Premium Must Be Judged Relatively (Credit vs. Width)

This is the most critical calculation. In a credit put spread, you receive a credit for taking on the risk defined by the width of the strikes. The risk is (Strike Width - Credit Received).

Practical Example: You look at a meme stock trading at $20.

  • Spread A: Sell the $15 Put / Buy the $14 Put. Strike width = $1. Credit received = $0.30. Risk = $1.00 - $0.30 = $0.70. Your credit is 30% of the width.
  • Spread B: Sell the $12 Put / Buy the $11 Put. Strike width = $1. Credit received = $0.15. Risk = $0.85. Your credit is 15% of the width.

Even though Spread A offers more absolute premium ($0.30 vs. $0.15), Spread B is significantly further OTM and thus has a much higher chance of expiring worthless. You must ask if the extra $0.15 in premium is worth the substantially higher risk of assignment. Often, with meme stocks, the safer, farther OTM spread provides a better risk-adjusted return.

3. Position Sizing is Paramount

This cannot be overstated. Because the risk of a sudden, catastrophic move is non-zero, your position size must be minuscule compared to your overall capital. A common rule for standard trades might be risking 1-5% of your portfolio on a single trade. For a meme stock credit spread, consider risking 0.5% or even less. The high probability is attractive, but the consequence of being wrong must be financially trivial.

4. Manage Duration: Shorter is (Usually) Smarter

While theta decay accelerates in the final weeks before expiration, holding a position in a meme stock for 45 days exposes you to an enormous number of unpredictable news cycles and sentiment shifts. Using shorter-duration options (e.g., 7-14 days until expiration) allows you to target rapid time decay while minimizing your time exposed to an overnight social media frenzy. However, this requires more active management.

A Real-World Hypothetical Scenario

Let's walk through a concrete, hypothetical trade on a stock resembling a meme stock, "Ticker MEME," using our adjusted framework.

  • Current Price: $250
  • Market Condition: High but not extreme volatility, no immediate earnings report.
  • Trader's Goal: Collect premium with a high POP, risking a very small portion of capital.
  • The Trade: Sell a 7-day-to-expiration put spread.
    • Short Put Strike: $180 (28% OTM)
    • Long Put Strike: $175 (30% OTM)
    • Strike Width: $5
    • Credit Received: $0.75
    • Max Risk: $5.00 - $0.75 = $4.25
    • Capital Secured/BPR: $500 (for 1 spread)
    • Return on Risk: $0.75 / $4.25 ≈ 17.6% in 7 days.
    • POP (Broker Estimate): 88%.

Analysis: The trader chose strikes significantly OTM (~30%). The credit of $0.75 is a respectable 15% of the strike width, indicating a good premium for the distance. The max loss of $4.25 per spread is sized appropriately small within their portfolio. The short duration limits time risk.

When the Myth Becomes Good Advice

Our debunking doesn't mean the meme stock arena is a free-for-all. The "avoid" rule morphs from a blanket statement into a conditional one. You MUST avoid meme stocks for credit put spreads when:

  • You cannot size the position appropriately (i.e., it would represent more than 1-2% of your portfolio risk).
  • You are not comfortable with the underlying company's business to the point where you would accept assignment of the shares at your short strike price. This is the ultimate risk of a put spread—being assigned shares well above their fundamental value.
  • The stock is in a state of extreme manic pumping; IV is in the 99th percentile, and rational analysis is impossible.
  • You are a beginner still mastering the Greeks and risk management for stable underlyings.

Conclusion: Knowledge Over Superstition

The myth that "You Must Avoid Meme Stocks for Credit Put Spreads" persists because it's a safe, simple heuristic. It prevents novice traders from blowing up their accounts. However, for the educated, disciplined trader, it represents an unnecessary limitation. By applying a stringent framework—seeking farther OTM strikes, judging premium relative to width, practicing microscopic position sizing, and controlling duration—you can potentially harvest attractive premium from these volatile names while strictly defining and minimizing your risk.

The core of options trading is not superstition about certain tickers, but the mathematical management of risk and reward. Meme stocks simply require that you dial your risk parameters to an ultra-conservative setting. Bust this myth, and you add another tool to your strategic toolbox, used judiciously and with extreme caution.